I’ve Paid For This Twice Already…

From financial imprisonment to financial independence, one snowflake at a time. This is one family’s story.

       
January 18th, 2008

Wise Investing Made Simple Review Part 1: Markets and Performance

For the next several weeks, I’ll be working my way through the book Wise Investing Made Simple by Larry Swedroe. This review covers the first eight chapters.

When I started Wise Investing Made Simple, I expected to be told to invest in index funds simply because that’s what I read on personal finance blogs as the “right” strategy. Other than that, I had no idea what it might say. I will be the first to admit, I know very little about investing. I want to know more about it, but obviously, I don’t want to know badly enough to have actually made some effort to learn much. So although I had no idea what else this book might say, I was still very excited to read it and see. I’ve divided the book up into sections for my review based on the topic of the chapters, and my first section covers the first 8 chapters.

This section basically talks about the market as a whole and how it works, financial advisors, and the elusive pursuit of beating the market, as well as how markets are efficient. The book used both explanations and stories to illustrate concepts, and I found that style very appealing. Be warned though that the majority of the analogies are sports ones, and although I enjoy sports and therefore liked them, it may not appeal to everyone. There are a few key concepts I learned about in this section, and I am going to explore those in detail for I found them really enlightening. Understanding the “why” of passive investing as well as the “how” is something that is very appealing to me, and this book so far has helped to do that. This is by no means everything the book covers, but these are the ideas that really clicked in my head and made me examine some assumptions about the stock market and investment strategies I didn’t even know I had.

Do financial advisors who claim to be able to beat the market recommend the same funds now they recommended 5 years ago?

The first concept that really made me think was this one. The first chapter is a story about a woman who has the choice between two financial advisors, one who has a passive investment strategy (not trying to beat the market simply establish a level of risk they find acceptable) and the other has an actively managed approach (trying to beat the market). When the woman talks to the passive-approach manager and asks how they can compete with the actively managed fund, he tells her to ask the broker what he was recommending five years ago and see if those lists are the same. The idea is that it is easy to find funds that outperformed the market in the past, but hard to predict which will in the future. I’d never really considered it that way, but it makes a lot of sense.

Markets are efficient.

The stock market in this section was compared and contrasted to betting on sports. In sports, we have amateurs (you and me) betting on different teams and basically setting the prices and point spread by our limited knowledge. We’re allowed to use insider information (if I know someone on a team is hurt I can use that knowledge in placing my bet) and yet, the only people who truly become rich betting on sports is the bookies. Compare that to the market, where professionals (financial advisors) are the ones making decisions about who to bet on (buy) and against (sell) and insider information is not allowed - and it is easier to see why the stock market runs efficiently and is hard to exploit. By the time the average person hears anything about a stock, it has already been incorporated into the price the stock is selling for. And the financial advisors are the ones making money (from fees) not the investors.

It’s not impossible to find an undervalued stock and exploit it, but it is self-limiting.

This was one of my favorite analogies in the entire book. The idea is, if you find a $20 bill on the ground, you pick it up, right? But you don’t then abandon your job and spend the rest of your life searching for $20 bills on the ground. An investment strategy based on finding winners other people have overlooked is like that. It is not impossible to do, but basing your entire strategy on trying to do it again and again is very hard. And once the undervalued stock is found, it is only undervalued for so long before other people realize it and get in on it too, and the market corrects itself.

Collective Wisdom Sets Prices

The prices of the market are not just set by a single investor or a single institution. They are set by the entirety of the market - the collective wisdom of all the people who participate. You may be able to outperform this collective wisdom, but the concept that you will be able to do so consistently and in perpetuity is a very tough one to take on. In this part the book goes into detail about a few different funds, showing how at one point they were great outperformers but they all eventually became underperformers. Looking back, you can pick what funds to invest in and where to jump ship, but the question is, can you do that looking forward? And in some cases, if you don’t know exactly the right time to sell and move on, you can lose a significant portion of your investment at once and not recover it. I loved this quote: “I own last year’s top performing funds. Unfortunately, I bought them this year.”

So, what is an investor to do?

So, now that we’ve talked about why market-timing strategies to “beat the market” don’t work, what is an investor to do? That’s what we’ll talk about next week. There’s a little more about breaking down assumptions that people make about investing and about the market, and then Swedroe starts talking about the “wise investing” part - ideas on how to make smart choices and let the efficiency of the market work *for* you instead of *against* you. Hopefully we’ll all learn how to provide for our futures with a level of risk we’re comfortable with. :)

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

You can also: Stumble It!   Bookmark   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Tip'd

9 Responses to “Wise Investing Made Simple Review Part 1: Markets and Performance”

  1. So far from what I’ve read on Moolanomy and here, I think Larry’s advice is spot on.

    If investors could only drown at the noise and follow a few basic principles they’d be fine… but that’s easier said than done, when a lot of what you see and read focuses on out- performers, trying to entice you to come chase.

  2. Your efficient market section attempts to make a distinction and fails, however don’t sweat it, that section should fail because there is little distinction.

    In the stock market we have analysts and brokers in sports we have handicappers & bookies they perform analogous roles to each other. The handicappers are the ones who analyze the upcoming events just like the analysts try to predict a companies performance and the brokers are the ones who take the bets. Of course it is not 100% () but the distinction is not that large here.

    Rules against insider information exist in sports and they are much more strict than what exists in corporate America. Coaches and players can not bet on the success (or failure) of their teams, whereas CEOs down to the janitor can bet for/against their corporate team. Also, most major sports leagues require full disclosure of injuries and the like.

    Collective wisdom also plays a role in sports gambling. What idiot would bet against the Packers or Patriots this weekend? This leads to another thing that admittedly crops up in sports a little more frequently and that is the surprise, but remember Enron?

    In fact, in many ways stock market investing is every bit as much gambling as gambling (another major industry is based on gambling) the difference being what is being bet on.

  3. Swedroe’s point is that it is even harder to win at the stock market than gambling - his analogy was that if you’re in the locker room before a game and see the star player fall and twist his ankle, you are allowed to call your bookie and make a bet on that vs using insider info about a company to make a stock pick. I think Swedroe would agree that stocks are analogous to gambling.

    I don’t know a whole lot about either gambling or the stock market but point spreads on games vary over the course of the time it is bet on in response to people betting, I think. That’s the amateur element at play. Again, I think. Not a gambler, am I ;)

  4. If you don’t think the stock market doesn’t swing back and forth because of the investors you have not been paying attention. The swing in spread is similar to a stock price. The market is setting the price of stock according to the risk and the reward.

    Another reason spreads fluctuate a lot more is because the closest thing to a central market maker is in Las Vegas but how many people have access to that? Not many, most as you say contact their local bookie, so gambling markets also have a more local focus. I bet the book on Green Bay this weekend is a lot more Packer friendly here in Appleton WI (25 miles from literally frozen Lambeau Field) than it is in New Jersey.

    Yeah, I have heard of people betting in sports events based on insider knowledge (one story I heard involved a sound tech at Billy Joel’s National Anthem rehearsal for the last Super Bowl who promptly went out and bet on the over/under on how long the performance would be IIRC the performance was actually over the time) but just like in the corporate setting, how many people are placed in such a fashion?

    However, what is the difference? The difference is government interference in the financial markets.

    Gambling and investing try to predict the future and both feature reward & loss.

    If you want to make money in either field one has to do their due diligence if I am reading the sports stats regularly I can pick winners with like .600-.650 average, but I have to spend time at it.

    I have not yet even mentioned insurance.

    The best point is the one starting off with the example of finding a $20.00 bill.

  5. I wonder how many investors are amateurs vs professionals in contrast to how many sports gamblers are amateurs vs professionals? I don’t have the answer to that - I just wonder.

Trackbacks:

  1. Recommended Readings for 1/20/08 | Millionaire Money Habits
  2. Wise Investing Made Simple Review Part 2: Debunking Common Investing Myths | I've Paid For This Twice Already...
  3. Wise Investing Made Simple Review Part 3: Information and What To Do With It | I've Paid For This Twice Already...
  4. Book Giveaway This Friday - Wise Investing Made Simple. | My Two Dollars

Leave a Reply

Have a Nice Day!